MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083910343 · doi:10.32393/csme.2020.1281

Spacial Simulation of Shipboard Operations for Skid-equipped Rotary-wing Aircraft

2020· article· en· W3083910343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkid (aerodynamics)AeronauticsAerospace engineeringWingMarine engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringSimulationMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SRAMSS (Skid-equipped Rotary-wing Aircraft Manoeuvring and Securing Simulation) is a simulation package aimed at generating transient aircraft behavior to study the dynamic interface between skid-equipped rotary-wing aircraft and ship decks during shipboard operations in elevated sea and weather conditions. The package incorporates dynamic finite element modelling into Kane's method for dynamics equations, contact mechanics with oriented dynamic response including the LuGre friction model to capture complex friction behavior, aerodynamic drag, and blade element theory to generate induced thrust and moments from the rotor disc. An overview of the model formulation, as well as several verification and validation test cases are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it