MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Damage and the Design of GI-Sparing NSAIDs

2018· article· en· W3083931149 on OpenAlexaff
John L. Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings for Annual Meeting of The Japanese Pharmacological Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonsteroidalMedicineGastrointestinal tractCyclooxygenaseHistaminePharmacologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyChemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to cause ulceration and bleeding throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is well established. The development of selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors has not had the beneficial impact that was claimed. Moreover, drugs developed to reduce NSAID-gastropathy, such as proton pump inhibitors and histamine H-2 receptor antagonists, have beneficial effects in the upper GI tract, but markedly worsen NSAID-induced damage in the lower GI tract. The mechanisms underlying the latter detrimental effects are become well understood, and progress is being made in developing NSAIDs that are safer in the lower intestine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings for Annual Meeting of The Japanese Pharmacological SocietySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207