Fêtes sonores : les 40 ans de Productions SuperMusique entendus par…
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La saison artistique 2020-2021 marque le 40e anniversaire de Productions SuperMusique, organisme au coeur de la musique actuelle à Montréal. 25 ans après le dossier « Définir la musique actuelle ? », paru dans Circuit en 1995, quatre des mêmes piliers de la musique actuelle – Michel F Côté, Jean Derome, Joane Hétu et Danielle Palardy Roger, encore très actifs aujourd’hui – reprennent ici la plume pour témoigner d’où ils en sont maintenant. À ces quatre voix s’ajoute celle de Scott Thomson, musicien anglophone de la nouvelle génération qui amène une perspective à la fois intérieure et extérieure sur l’évolution de SuperMusique. Cette collection de cinq textes constitue, ainsi, une source d’informations de première main sur l’un des phares de la scène montréalaise des musiques improvisées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".