MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083945973 · doi:10.32393/csme.2020.1166

Potatoes Sustainability in Prince Edward Island

2020· article· en· W3083945973 on OpenAlexaffabout
Junaid Maqsood, Aitazaz A. Farooque, Farhat Abbas

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityGeographyEnvironmental ethicsHistoryEcologyPhilosophyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potato is the major food crop in Prince Edward Island, Canada and agriculture is highly dependent on local weather and climate especially in rain-fed areas. This research focuses on finding different climate extreme indices for growing season (May-October) and examining their impacts on tuber yield in Island. Changing patterns of different temperature and precipitation extreme indices for 30 years period from data of five meteorological stations (East Point, Charlottetown, New Glasgow, Summerside and Alberton) were calculated using ClimPACT2. Statistically significance of the trends and their slope magnitude were determined by using Mann-Kendall test and Sen's slope estimates respectively. Data of the selected meteorological stations were averaged to calculate the climate extreme indices for the whole Island. There were increasing trends at most of the stations for continuous dry days, warm and warmest nights, summer days, tropical nights and decreasing trends for total precipitation, daily temperature range, frost days, cold days and cold nights. The patterns of climate extreme indices in the growing season helped in examining the effects of the climate change on tuber yield. The stepwise regression (forward selection) model showed that 43.99% of tuber yield variance was attributed to Continuous Dry Days (CDD), Daily Temperature Range (DTR), Daily Maximum Temperature (TXx) and Tropical Nights (TR) climatic factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3Same topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207