MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083946492 · doi:10.26508/lsa.202000674

MicroRNA regulation of murine trophoblast stem cell self-renewal and differentiation

2020· article· en· W3083946492 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sarbani Saha, Rupasri Ain

Bibliographic record

VenueLife Science Alliance · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsTrophoblastBiologyCell biologymicroRNACDC20Stem cellCyclin E1Cellular differentiationCell cycleCyclin D1CellGeneticsPlacentaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proper placentation is fundamental to successful pregnancy. Placenta arises from differentiation of trophoblast stem (TS) cells during development. Despite being recognized as the counterpart of ES cells in placental development, the role of regulatory miRNAs in TS cell differentiation remains inadequately explored. Here, we have identified complete repertoire of microRNAs present in mouse trophoblast cells in proliferative and differentiated state. We demonstrated that two miRNA clusters, -290 and -322, displayed reciprocal expression during trophoblast differentiation. Loss of miR-290 cluster members or gain in miR-322 cluster members led to differentiation of TS cells. The trophoblast stemness factor, CDX2, transactivated the miR-290 cluster and Cyclin D1 . MiR-290 cluster members repressed cell cycle repressors, P21, P27, WEE1, RBL2, and E2F7, in TS cells. MiR-322 cluster members repressed the cell cycle activators, CYCLIN D1, CYCLIN E1, CDC25B, and CDX2, to induce differentiation. Taken together, our findings highlight the importance of posttranscriptional regulation by conserved miRNA clusters that form a regulatory network with CDX2, cell cycle activators, and repressors in equipoising TS cell self-renewal and differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLife Science AllianceSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207