Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’étudier de quelles manières les réalisations de la cinéaste Sophie Goyette s’inscrivent dans le cinéma contemporain des femmes au Québec, et comment elles en redéfinissent certains contours en privilégiant le motif de « l’entre-deux » pour parler de construction identitaire et d’affranchissement de soi. À travers l’analyse de Mes nuits feront écho (2016) et des courts-métrages de Goyette (La Ronde, Le Futur proche, Manèges), il est possible de constater qu’une poésie du « contournement » ressort de façon singulière, autant au point de vue du traitement narratif (lié aux questions de deuil, d’onirisme, de traversée intérieure) que des choix formels et esthétiques de la cinéaste. Cet article prend aussi le parti d’explorer, à travers l’exemple de Sophie Goyette, l’importance de la liberté créatrice entre réalisatrices et actrices. À plus large échelle, il met l’accent sur l’importance de mieux considérer la spécificité des sensibilités féminines des cinéastes québécoises à travers les différentes formes de subjectivité qu’elles travaillent, afin de continuer à déconstruire collectivement l’idée du « film de femme » et les présupposés qui l’accompagnent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".