MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083966911

Frequency Regulation Model of Bulk Power Systems with Energy Storage

2020· preprint· en· W3083966911 on OpenAlexaff
Claudio A. Cañizares, Kankar Bhattacharya, Daniel Sohm

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy storageElectric power systemFrequency regulationComputer scienceTransient (computer programming)InterconnectionFlywheelComputer data storageStability (learning theory)Transmission (telecommunications)Power (physics)Flywheel energy storageEnergy management systemState of chargeEnergy (signal processing)Reliability engineeringBattery (electricity)Energy managementEngineeringTelecommunicationsAutomotive engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a dynamic Frequency Regulation (FR) model of a large interconnected power system including Energy Storage Systems (ESSs) such as Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) and Flywheel Energy Storage Systems (FESSs), considering all relevant stages in the frequency control process. Communication delays are considered in the transmission of the signals in the FR control loop and ESSs, and their State of Charge (SoC) management model is considered. The system, ESSs and SoC components are modelled in detail from a FR perspective. The model is validated using real system and ESSs data, based on a practical transient stability model of the North American Eastern Interconnection (NAEI), and the results show that the proposed model accurately represents the FR process of a large interconnected power network including ESS, and can be used for long-term FR studies. The impact of communication delays and SoC management of ESS facilities in the Area Control Error (ACE) is also studied and discussed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.130
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207