Air flow model development and application in a complex combined sewer system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A steady-state air flow model was developed and applied in a complex combined sewer system in the city of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The model solves the continuity at each junction and the momentum equation for the links coupled with dropshaft and other manholes. The dropshaft pressure gradient is computed using the dropshaft equation and air flow rate through manhole pickholes is computed considering the opening as an orifice. A leakage factor is used as a calibration parameter to represent the area through which air can leak from the manholes into the neighborhood. The model uses an iterative solution algorithm with a forward sweep for the continuity and backward sweep for the momentum equation. An underrelaxation is applied to update pressure in each iteration for model stability. The model was calibrated and validated by using the measured air flow rate and manhole pressure in the sewer network, with good results. An analysis of the air flow characteristics shows that a significant amount of air is brought into the system due to a large headspace in the upstream trunk but over 70% of this air is released into the neighborhood due to reduced headspace in the downstream trunk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".