MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084101048 · doi:10.32393/csme.2020.19

Design and Calibration of a Test Rig for Shimmy Damper Characterization

2020· article· en· W3084101048 on OpenAlexaff
Mir Sakib Mustashin, Kamran Behdinan

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeed wobbleCalibrationDamperComputer scienceCharacterization (materials science)Test (biology)EngineeringStructural engineeringGeologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shimmy dampers are used to attenuate the oscillatory motion encountered during ground operation of aircraft landing gear. This paper presents the development of a test rig for characterizing nose landing gear shimmy damper. This apparatus was designed to simulate ground operation of an aircraft nose landing gear. A roller drum is used to simulate landing and takeoff speeds, while an impact moment mechanism was used to induce shimmy, forcing shimmy vibration through tire slip. Weights can be used to induce vertical force which simulates the fuselage weight. Initial experimental results are presented to illustrate the operation and performance of the rig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3Same topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207