MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3084107050 · doi:10.1101/2020.09.08.287177

Species-specific differences in antagonism of APOBEC3 proteins by HIV-2 and SIVsmm Vif proteins

2020· preprint· en· W3084107050 on OpenAlexaff
Rayhane Nchioua, Dorota Kmieć, Amit Gaba, Christina M. Stürzel, Tyson B. Follack, Stephen Patrick, Andrea Kirmaier, Welkin E. Johnson, Beatrice H. Hahn, Linda Chelico, Frank Kirchhoff

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiologyVirologyMacaqueRecombinant DNAAlleleHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Rhesus macaquePolymorphism (computer science)HIV vaccineGeneticsInterferonGeneVaccine trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT SIVsmm infecting sooty mangabeys has been transmitted to humans on at least nine independent occasions, giving rise to HIV-2 groups A to I. SIVsmm isolates replicate in human T cells and seem capable of overcoming major human restriction factors without adaptation. However, only groups A and B are responsible for the HIV-2 epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa and it is largely unclear whether adaptive changes were associated with significant spread in humans. To address this, we examined the sensitivity of infectious molecular clones (IMCs) of five HIV-2 strains (4 group A and one AB recombinant) and representatives of five different SIVsmm lineages to inhibition by type I interferon (IFN) and various APOBEC3 proteins. We confirmed that SIVsmm strains replicate in primary human CD4+ T cells. However, SIVsmm replication was highly variable, typically lower relative to HIV-2 isolates and almost entirely prevented by type I IFN treatment. Viral propagation was generally dependent on intact vif genes, highlighting the need for efficient counteraction of APOBEC3 proteins. On average, SIVsmm strains were significantly more susceptible to inhibition by human APOBEC3D, F, G and H than HIV-2 IMCs. For example, human APOBEC3F reduced infectious virus yield of SIVsmm by ∼80% but achieved only ∼40% in the case of HIV-2. Functional and mutational analyses of human, sooty mangabey and rhesus macaque derived alleles revealed that an R128T polymorphism in APOBEC3F is important for species-specific counteraction by HIV-2 and SIVsmm Vif proteins. In addition, we found that changes of Y45H and T84S in SIVsmm Vif increase its ability to antagonize human APOBEC3F. Altogether, our results show that SIVsmm Vifs show some intrinsic activity against human ABOBEC3 proteins, but HIV-2 Vifs acquired adaptive changes to efficiently clear this barrier in the human host. AUTHOR SUMMARY SIVs infecting African monkey species do not infect humans, with one notable exception. SIVsmm from sooty mangabeys managed to cross the species barrier to humans on at least nine independent occasions. This is because SIVsmm strains seem capable of overcoming many innate defense mechanisms without adaptation and that their Vif proteins are active against human APOBEC3 proteins. Here, we show that replication of SIVsmm is highly variable in human CD4 T cells and more sensitive to interferon inhibition compared to HIV-2. While different lineages of SIVsmm were capable of counteracting human APOBEC3 proteins in a Vif-dependent manner, they were significantly more susceptible to inhibition by APOBEC3D/F/G/H compared to HIV-2. Mutational analyses revealed an R128T substitution in APOBEC3F and a T84S change in Vif are relevant for species-specific counteraction by HIV-2 and SIVsmm. Altogether, our results support that HIV-2 group A adapted to humans prior to or during epidemic spread.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→