MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084114076 · doi:10.1161/hyp.76.suppl_1.p094

Abstract P094: Crosstalk Between Mas And ET <sub>B</sub> R Elicits Protective Effects In Endothelial Cells And Vascular Function

2020· article· en· W3084114076 on OpenAlexaff
Jithin Kuriakose, Augusto C. Montezano, Katie Y Hood, Rhéure Alves-Lopes, Angie Sin, Patrícia Passaglia, J. N. Findlay, Sehrish Basheer, Hiba Yusuf, R Hepburn, Robson A.S. Santos, Margaret R. MacLean, George Baillie, Rhian M. Touyz

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperoxideEnosAntagonistReceptorAngiotensin IIChemistryEndocrinologyReactive oxygen speciesInternal medicineMolecular biologyPharmacologyNitric oxideMedicineBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeNitric oxide synthase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mas and ET B receptors physically interact in endothelial cells (ECs) and are involved in the protective actions of angiotensin 1-7 (Ang (1-7)). We assessed whether the MAS/ET B R interaction plays a role in EC signalling and whether strategies to enhance MAS/ET B R association influence vascular responses. Human ECs were stimulated with Ang (1-7) (10 -7 M) in the presence/absence of A779 (Mas receptor antagonist, 10 -5 M) and BQ788 (ET B R antagonist, 10 -5 M). Protein expression and signalling activation were assessed by immunoblotting. NO production was evaluated by DAF-FM fluorescence and ROS production by chemiluminescence (superoxide anion) or amplex red (hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 )). mRNA expression was assessed by qPCR. Endothelial function was assessed in mouse intact arteries by myography. Ang (1-7), through Mas and ET B R induced phosphorylation of eNOS (35%); followed by an increase in NO production (2.0 fold) (p<0.05 vs ctl). High throughput screening of protein:protein interaction compounds in an in-house library identified 23 potential enhancers of the MAS/ET B R interaction. Fluorescence polarization assays were used to further select the most potent enhancers and define their working concentration for testing in ECs (Enh1-4: 10 -5 M). Enh4 increased superoxide anion (55.6±26.3% vs ctl, p<0.05) and H 2 O 2 production (54.7±11.1% vs ctl, p<0.05), while Enh3 increased H 2 O 2 generation (48.1±15.4% vs ctl, p<0.05) in ECs. Moreover, Enh4 increased Nrf2 (3.0 fold), Sod1 (2.0 fold) and Nqo1 (3.1 fold) mRNA expression (p<0.05 vs ctl). Enh3 and Enh4 increased NO production (Enh3: 21.2±7.4%; Enh4: 23.6±8.2% vs veh, p<0.05) in ECs. Acetylcholine (Ach) curves were performed to assess endothelium-dependent relaxation in the absence and presence of enhancers. Enh4 increased ACh-induced relaxation (Emax%: 96.7±4.6 vs ctl: 70.4±3.3, p<0.05), while other enhancers did not improve endothelial function. Taken together, increasing MAS/ET B R interaction with specific enhancers augments protective signalling in ECs and promotes endothelial-dependent vasorelaxation, particularly with Enh4. In conclusion, enhancing interactions between MasR and ET B R may be a new vasoprotective strategy to improve vascular function in cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207