MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084117439 · doi:10.5294/978-958-12-0513-4

Sexualidad y fecundidad. Reflexiones sobre el inicio de la vida humana

2019· book· es· W3084117439 on OpenAlexaff
A. González Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerontologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autor: Amanda Rodríguez López Formato: Impreso ISBN: 9789581205134 Editorial: Universidad de La Sabana Fecha de edición: 01/04/2019 Descripción: Esta guía describe conocimientos que permiten profundizar en el inicio de la vida humana como resultado de la unión fecunda entre un hombre y una mujer, que le darán al lector algunas herramientas para proyectar la paternidad y la maternidad en su plan de vida matrimonial. A medida que se comprenda mejor el desarrollo humano desde sus etapas iniciales y de los cambios naturales que ocurren en la mujer en el periodo de la gestación, aumentará la capacidad de reconocer la dignidad del ser humano y, en consecuencia, de la sexualidad conyugal, cuna de vida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207