MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084143673 · doi:10.32393/csme.2020.1263

High Pressure and High Temperature Flash-boiling Atomization

2020· article· en· W3084143673 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Akbarnozari, Saeed Garmeh, Christian Moreau, Ali Dolatabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoilingFlash (photography)Materials scienceNuclear engineeringThermodynamicsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flash atomization is a technique to generate fine spray which can be used for effective heat and momentum transfer. Pressure and temperature of liquid are among the main parameters to control the process. Nucleation, bubble formation, and atomization are stages of this process. Rapid heating or rapid depressurizing is used to make the metastable fluid and eventually the spray. Comprehensive understanding of characteristics of the spray is essential for applications such as heating and fuel injection. Therefore, in this research the effect of superheat degree on atomization was evaluated. Moreover, the effect of pressure and temperature of the fluid on spray characteristics were studied. The spray shape, breakup length, and spray angles were experimentally investigated to provide a better understanding and interpretation of observations. The result showed that a distinct dense core was surrounded with a sheath of less dense spray. An interesting finding from high-speed imaging is that the spray pulsation is negligible. It seems a high-quality spray is achievable as a result of flash-boiling atomization at high pressure and high temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3Same topicFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207