Parallel spin stripes and their coexistence with superconducting ground states at optimal and high doping in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>La</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Nd</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sr</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>CuO</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-dimensional, commensurate long-range magnetic order in La 2 CuO 4 quickly evolves to quasi-twodimensional, incommensurate correlations upon doping with mobile holes, and superconductivity follows for x as small as 0.05 in the La 2-x Sr x /Ba x CuO 4 family of superconductors. The onset of superconductivity in these systems is known to be coincident with a remarkable rotation of the incommensurate spin order from "diagonal stripes" below x = 0.05 to "parallel stripes" above. However, little is known about the spin correlations at optimal and high doping levels, around and beyond the proposed quantum critical point for the pseudogap phase, p * . Here, we present elastic and inelastic neutron scattering measurements on single crystals of La 1.6-x Nd 0.4 Sr x CuO 4 with x = 0.125, 0.19, 0.24, and 0.26 and show that two-dimensional, quasistatic, parallel spin stripes have an onset at temperatures such that the parallel spin stripe phase extends beyond p * and envelops the entirety of superconducting ground states in this system. We also show that the elastic order parameter for parallel spin stripes at optimum doping, x = 0.19, displays an inflection point at superconducting T c , while the lowenergy dynamic spectral weight of parallel stripe fluctuations grows with decreasing temperature and saturates below T c .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.819 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".