MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084179292 · doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.022

Factors associated with maintaining reduction following locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures: a population-based retrospective cohort study

2020· article· en· W3084179292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJSES International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCovenant HealthSturgeon Community HospitalGrey Nuns Community HospitalAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioFixation (population genetics)RadiographyProximal humerusRetrospective cohort studyReduction (mathematics)HumerusPopulationSurgeryInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Loss of reduction (LoR) can occur after locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). This study determined biomechanical features of fracture fixation associated with preventing LoR postoperatively. One-year reoperation rates were also compared between those with/without LoR. <h3>Methods</h3> Population-based administrative data for 359 adults treated using a locking plate for PHF between 2010 and 2016 were examined. Two trained assessors reviewed standardized shoulder radiographs. LoR (Yes/No) was defined as any fracture displacement >0.5 cm, and/or >10° change in neck-shaft angle (NSA) alignment relative to intraoperative imaging. Multiple logistic regression assessed how the following affected maintaining reduction: (1) sex, (2) age, (3) Neer classification, (4) shaft impaction (SI), (5) shaft medialization (SM), (6) calcar reduction (CR), (7) NSA alignment, and (8) screw use. <h3>Results</h3> LoR was seen in 79 (22%) patients. LoR was significantly associated with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06/yr, <i>P</i> < .001), fracture severity (4-part vs. 2-part fracture; OR = 4.63, <i>P</i> = .001), and varus NSA alignment (<125° vs. ≥145°: OR = 5.6, <i>P</i> = .02; <125° vs. 125-145°, OR = 2.2, <i>P</i> = .02]). Patients achieving simultaneous SI, SM, and CR were significantly less likely (OR = 0.009, <i>P</i> < .001) to lose reduction, after controlling for age, fracture severity, and NSA alignment. If only SI was achieved, patients were still significantly less likely to lose reduction relative to achieving none of these mechanical features (OR = 0.17, <i>P</i> = .006). Reoperations were higher when LoR occurred (n = 26/77 [33.4%]) compared with no LoR (n = 20/276 [7.2%]) (<i>P</i> < .001). <h3>Conclusions</h3> SI was strongly associated with preventing LoR in patients treated using a locking plate for PHF. SI with concurrent SM, CR, and a neutral or valgus NSA had the lowest rates of LoR. LoR was associated with higher rates of reoperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it