Passive House Alternative Proposal for the Brazilian Bioclimatic Zone 8
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The energy consumption in buildings accounts for a significant portion of energy production worldwide hence there is a growing interest in the development of more efficient projects. One way to achieve buildings with low energy consumption while maintaining a high thermal comfort is the Passive House concept. This paper discusses the alternative approach of the Passive House standard for hot climates. The certification refers to a low-energy building standard for cold climate regions that the indoor comfort conditions can be maintained yearround with a specific minimum energy consumption target. There cannot be a single Passive House concept since there are climatic variations. Thus, the Passive House Institute reviewed the proposal for the application of the standard to meet hot climate regions around the world. This study is located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and considered a residential project proposal for the city of Pelotas, Brazil. The EnergyPlus software performed the new simulations, to verify the potential of the Passive House concept adoption in Brazil, whose territory is mainly characterized by hot climates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it