MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084199884 · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.020

From discourse to pathology: Automatic identification of Parkinson's disease patients via morphological measures across three languages

2020· article· en· W3084199884 on OpenAlexaff
Elif Eyigöz, Mélody Courson, Lucas Sedeño, Katharina Rogg, Juan Rafael Orozco‐Arroyave, Elmar Nöth, Sabine Skodda, Natalia Trujillo, Mabel Rodríguez, Jan Rusz, Édinson Muñoz, Juan F. Cardona, Eduar Herrera, Eugenia Hesse, Agustín Ibáñez, Guillermo Cecchi, Adolfo M. García

Bibliographic record

VenueCortex · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsFondo para la Investigación Científica y TecnológicaFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoHorizon 2020Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaRainwater Charitable FoundationSistema General de Regalías de ColombiaDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Universidad de AntioquiaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasNational Institutes of HealthUniversidad del ValleGlobal Brain Health InstituteMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské RepublikyNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsPsychologyVerbNounEmbodied cognitionGermanDiscriminative modelCognitionAudiologyCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceLinguisticsMedicineComputer scienceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCortexSame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207