The project of Halsey Street (Brooklyn, NY): documentation and materialisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl distrito historico de Bedford (Brooklyn, NY) se desarrollo como un barrio burgues en las dos ultimas decadas del siglo xix, siendo la tipologia predominante las viviendas unifamiliares en hilera. Su atractivo parque inmobiliario a dia de hoy mantiene practicamente intacta su imagen de ese momento, debido fundamentalmente a la pobreza y a la condicion de gueto que lo ha caracterizado durante la segunda mitad del siglo xx.Este trabajo se realizo a raiz de una investigacion sobre la arquitectura de un tramo de calle de este distrito, escogido por configurar un paisaje urbano historico considerablemente homogeneo y armonico a pesar de los diferentes estilos que presentan sus fachadas, al ser todas ellas viviendas en hilera del mismo material, la misma anchura y practicamente la misma altura.La metodologia empleada en esta investigacion consistio en un analisis historico y documental de estas fachadas y un estudio de fuentes bibliograficas, con el fin de presentar los aspectos cromaticos y materiales de este entorno. EnglishBedford Historic District (Brooklyn, NY) developed as an upper-middleclass quarter over the last two decades of the 19th century, being townhouses the main building type. Its handsome housing stock keeps its image of that moment virtually intact, due basically to poverty and the ghetto condition that has distinguished it during the second half of the 20th century.This work stemmed from the research on the architecture of a row of houses within this district, which was chosen because it boasted considerably homogeneous and harmonious streetscapes despite the different styles of its facades, being all of them townhouses of the same material, the same width and mostly the same height.The methodology employed in this research consisted of a historical and documentary analysis of these facades and the study of bibliographical resources, in order to present the chromatic and material aspects of these surroundings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".