Parametric Study of Energy Dissipating Steel Plate Fuses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Steel plate devices are broadly used in earthquake-resistant structures to provide energy dissipation. Understanding the cyclic response of these steel plate fuses requires comprehensive investigation of different fuse link design parameters. This goal can be achieved using finite element analysis. This paper presents the finite element modeling and sensitivity study of steel plate fuse links. Threedimensional finite element models are first developed and validated against past experimental tests. While validating the finite element models, several important components, including element type, material and meshing properties, boundary conditions, loading profile, and analysis method are discussed. The design of experiment (DOE) is then used to generate factor combinations for the parametric study. Seven potentially influential design factors related to the material or geometry of steel plate fuses are considered as input factors. Next, the cyclic response of fuses is assessed in terms of initial stiffness, yield strength, ultimate stiffness, effective damping, maximum load capacity, and ductility. The percentage contribution of significant design factors on each cyclic response variable is obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it