MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084223402 · doi:10.14744/nci.2020.23911

Is mediolateral episiotomy angle associated with postpartum perineal pain in primiparous women?

2020· article· en· W3084223402 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Halenur Bozdağ

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthern Clinics of Istanbul · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpisiotomyMedicineMcGill Pain QuestionnaireVisual analogue scaleObstetricsPostpartum periodPhysical therapyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P ostpartum period is important for maternal and neona- tal surveillance.Adaptation of newborn this period depends on overall mother' s wellbeing [1].In this period, perineal pain obstructs mother' s mobility in daily activities particularly breastfeeding period and disturbs her ability to care for her baby.Postpartum perineal pain has been reported with the range from 92% to 100 % of all women.Bruising of perineum with spontaneous trauma or surgical ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to elucidate the relationship between mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) angle and postpartum perineal pain.METHODS: This study was designed prospectively.Primiparous women with MLE in the postpartum period were included in the study and divided into three groups according to episiotomy angle ranges (Group 1: <40°, Group 2: 40°-60°, and Group 3: >60°).Postpartum perineal pain was quantified with the short-form McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) consisting of the following three parts: Sensory-affective-verbal descriptions, visual pain scale (VPS), and present pain intensity scale (PPI).Postpartum perineal pain scores on days 1 and 7 were compared among the angle group. RESULTS:Overall, 86 eligible women were enrolled in this study.Seventy-three women (85%) scored the perineal pain between 0 and 3 on the VPS and 13 women (15%) rated the pain from 4 to 6 on the 1 st postpartum day.No significant differences were noted among the three groups regarding the total pain scores on SF-MPQ and on the each part of form at the 1 st postpartum day.At 7 days postpartum, total pain score was found significantly high in Group 1 [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 4 (0-5)] compared with Group 2 [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-5)].The pain scores obtained from the sensory, affective, VPS, and PPI parts of the questionnaire were [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 1 (0-2)], [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 1 (0-1)], [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 2 (0-2)], and [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0.25 (0-1)], respectively, in Group 1.For Group 2, pain scores obtained from the sensory, affective, and PPI were [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-1)]; and VPS was [Med; IQR (min-max)=0; 0(0-2)].No significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 2 for each part of the questionnaire on day 7. Percentage of need for analgesics on day 7 was found significantly higher in Group 1 (42.9%)than Group 2 (31.2%)CONCLUSION: MLE at an angle <40° to the midline is associated with a higher score of perineal pain and an increase need for analgesics during the early postpartum days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthern Clinics of IstanbulSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207