Two-phase permeable non-Newtonian cross-nanomaterial flow with Arrhenius energy and entropy generation: Darcy-Forchheimer model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The present work concentrates on two-dimensional steady incompressible flow of a non-Newtonian cross nanofluid past a linear stretching/shrinking sheet with a magnetic field in Darcy-Forchheimer porous regime. The entropy theory with Arrhenius energy is incorporated into the study. The shooting method is employed to obtain numerical solutions of the transformed system of non-linear equations. The influence of the governing parameters on the non-dimensional velocity, temperature, micro-rotation, drag force, heat and mass transfer rates, rate of entropy generation, Bejan number, streamlines and finally isotherms are incorporated. The significant outcomes of the current investigation are that increment in suction parameter uplifts flow velocity, temperature and concentration while injection is petered out them. Bejan number augments due to increment in inertia coefficient while reduces due to magnetic strength and Eckert number.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it