MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084259919 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v15i3.398

Arterial Placement of Central Venous Catheters

2020· article· en· W3084259919 on OpenAlex
Benjamin Wierstra, Kenton Rommens, Paul Cantle, Selena Au

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal jugular veinCentral venous catheterJugular veinCatheterSurgeryGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arterial misplacement of central venous catheters can often be avoided with the use of realtime ultrasound-guided procedural competency. However, misplacement can still occur and is more likely to occur when the internal jugular vein is located directly above the common carotid artery. The resultant injury to the common carotid artery occurs through the posterior wall of the internal jugular vein. Arterial injury may also occur when the subclavian vein is attempted in a non-ultrasound-guided fashion. Optimal management requires a coordinated evaluation of the catheter misplacement by Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery to ensure maximum patient safety during catheter removal. This article reviews the literature on this topic and provides a summary of the best approach to safely remove the misplaced catheter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it