MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084334014 · doi:10.33025/ceb.v5i2.2782

A IMPORTÂNCIA DO RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DOCENTE NA RETRATAÇÃO DO COTIDIANO ESCOLAR

2020· article· pt· W3084334014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de Educação Básica · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo apresenta a importância do relato de experiencia para retratar o cotidiano escolar. Inicialmente, utilizam-se os estudos de Mikhail Bakhtin e Luis Antonio Marchuschi, com o intuito de compreender melhor a estrutura e funcionalidade do genero textual analisado. Assim, tambem, necessitou-se elucidar as questoes que envolvem o estudo do cotidiano com Agnes Heller, Henri Lefebvre e Michel de Certeau. Como base da analise proposta, os relatos de experiencia docente no suburbio de Toronto do pesquisador Peter Mc Lares foram relacionados com os teoricos da educacao para demonstrar a importância desse genero tanto nas pesquisas sobre Educacao, Cultura Escolar e cotidiano Escolar, como tambem para motivar professores na sua carreira.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it