MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3084403015 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834122

The Northern Extragalactic WISE × Pan-STARRS (NEWS) catalogue

2020· article· en· W3084403015 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vladislav Khramtsov, V. S. Akhmetov, P. N. Fedorov

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryJet Propulsion LaboratoryLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryCarnegie Institution of WashingtonPlanetary Science DivisionCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesYork UniversityMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceUniversity of Colorado BoulderCarnegie Institution for ScienceInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikEuropean Space AgencySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Development and Reform CommissionEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityUniversity of EdinburghQueen's UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieUniversity of OxfordDurham UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoSpace Telescope Science InstituteScience Mission DirectorateLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionYale UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationQueen's University BelfastGordon and Betty Moore FoundationVanderbilt UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsQuasarSkyAstrophysicsStarsGalaxyApparent magnitudeAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study involves two photometric catalogues, AllWISE and Pan-STARRS Data Release 1, which were cross-matched to identify extragalactic objects among the common sources of these catalogues. To separate galaxies and quasars from stars, we created a machine-learning model that is trained on photometric (in fact, colour-based) information from the optical and infrared wavelength ranges. The model is based on three important procedures: the construction of the autoencoder artificial neural network, separation of galaxies and quasars from stars with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, and cleaning of the AllWISE × PS1 sample to remove sources with abnormal colour indices using a one-class SVM. As a training sample, we employed a set of spectroscopically confirmed sources from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 14. Having applied the classification model to the data of crossing the AllWISE and Pan-STARRS DR1 samples, we created the Northern Extragalactic WISE × Pan-STARRS (NEWS) catalogue, containing 40 million extragalactic objects and covering 3/4 of celestial sphere up tog = 23m. Several independent classification quality tests, namely, the astrometric test along with others based on the use of data from spectroscopic surveys show similar results and indicate a high purity (∼98.0%) and completeness (> 98%) for the NEWS catalogue within the magnitude range of 19.0m < g < 22.5m. The classification quality still retains quite acceptable levels of 70% for purity and 97% for completeness for the brightest and faintest objects from this magnitude range. In addition, validation with external data sets has demonstrated the need for using only those sources in the NEWS catalogue that are outside the zone with the enhanced extinction. We show that the number of quasars from the NEWS catalogue identified inGaiaDR2 exceeds the number of quasars previously identified inGaiaDR2 with the use of the AllWISEAGN catalogue. These quasars may be used in future as an additional sample for testing and anchoring theGaiaCelestial Reference Frame.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→