Fêter la Saint-Jean-Baptiste en Nouvelle-Angleterre : entre l'érable, le lys et l'étoile (1900-1930)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce memoire s'interesse aux representations symboliques et identitaires emanant des celebrations franco-americaines de la Saint-Jean-Baptiste en Nouvelle-Angleterre de 1900 a 1930. A l'aide d'une typologie des composantes des celebrations qui tirent leurs racines aussi bien du Canada francais que des Etats-Unis, nous avons ete en mesure d'identifier deux moments charnieres qui influencent drastiquement le format des celebrations; soit la Grande Guerre (1914-1918) et la crise sentinelliste (1924-1928). Ce memoire avance que la guerre augmente les representations symboliques des Etats-Unis lors du conflit, et que la crise sentinelliste est un moment ou l'on instrumentalise politiquement la celebration devenant en elle-meme un enjeu de pouvoir. A l'aide d'un corpus de sources compose de journaux et d'archives de l'USJBA, nous avons ete en mesure de recenser comptes rendus, photographies et editoriaux se rapportant a la Saint-Jean-Baptiste. Au sortir de l'analyse des drapeaux, des chars allegoriques et des hymnes nationaux recenses durant les celebrations, nous posons comme constat que les Franco-Americains naviguent entre trois poles nationaux referentiels : le Canada, la France et les Etats-Unis. Les representations symboliques et identitaires qui s'y referent remplissent des fonctions de legitimation et de validation de l'experience civique franco-americaine vecue par les individus de cette communaute. _____________________________________________________________________________ MOTS-CLES DE L’AUTEUR : Histoire; Franco-Americains; Saint-Jean-Baptiste; Usage du passe; 20e siecle; Representations
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".