MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084416598 · doi:10.7202/1070567ar

Analyse de source : trois recensements à l’île Saint-Pierre (1872, 1887 et 1892)

2020· article· fr· W3084416598 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nicolas Landry

Bibliographic record

VenuePort Acadie Revue interdisciplinaire en études acadiennes · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche s’inscrit dans la continuité du projet Archipel, portant sur l’histoire démographique, sociale et économique de l’archipel français de Saint-Pierre et Miquelon de 1763 à 1920. Il s’agit de savoir s’il est possible de cerner les particularités sociodémographiques de cette population s’adonnant presque exclusivement à des activités maritimes. Les travaux précédents de l’auteur ayant exploité les données provenant des registres de l’état civil et de dénombrements couvrant la période 1763-1850, ce texte traite d’une nouvelle tranche de ce projet avec le dépouillement des recensements de 1872, 1887 et 1892 pour la seule île de Saint-Pierre. Si cette recherche n’a pas la prétention de répondre à un très grand nombre de questions, elle n’en ouvre pas moins une fenêtre sur une meilleure compréhension des réalités de cette population maritime francophone du golfe du Saint-Laurent durant le dernier tiers du xixe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.027
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePort Acadie Revue interdisciplinaire en études acadiennesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207