MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3084419465 · doi:10.1101/2020.09.04.20188243

Lack of evidence for association of <i>UQCRC1</i> with Parkinson’s disease in Europeans

2020· preprint· en· W3084419465 on OpenAlexafffund
Konstantin Senkevich, Sara Bandrés‐Ciga, Ziv Gan‐Or, Lynne Krohn

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanada First Research Excellence FundConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementParkinson CanadaMcGill UniversityFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseDiseaseGenetic associationLRRK2Genome-wide association studyGeneticsBiologyMedicineSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recently, a novel variant p.Y314S in UQCRC1 has been implicated as pathogenic in Parkinson’s disease (PD). In the current study, we aimed to examine the association of UQCRC1 with PD in large cohorts of European origin. We examined common and rare genetic variation in UQCRC1 using genome-wide association study data from the International Parkinson Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), including 14,671 cases and 17,667 controls, and whole-genome sequencing data from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Parkinson’s disease initiative (AMP-PD), including 1,647 PD patients and 1,050 controls. No common variants were consistently associated with PD, and a variety of burden analyses did not reveal an association between rare variants in UQCRC1 and PD. Therefore, our results do not support a major role for UQCRC1 in PD in the European population, and additional studies in other populations are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→