MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084429505 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v15i3.462

COVID-19: A Comprehensive Overview

2020· article· en· W3084429505 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Hira Amir, Ally P.H. Prebtani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirusARDSPneumoniaPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Multiorgan failureOutbreakTransmission (telecommunications)VirologyIntensive care medicineImmunologyDiseaseLungInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronaviruses are important pathogens reported in humans and animals. A novel coronavirus, formally known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified as a cause of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, in late 2019. Since its outbreak in China, it has disproportionately affected many countries. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was officially declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020 and remains a global concern. A spectrum of disease severity has been reported with a variable course of illness from mild upper respiratory symptoms, pneumonia to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, multiorgan dysfunction and death. The worldwide dissemination of the virus justifies the global efforts in identifying potential treatment strategies and a vaccine for improved clinical and long-term outcomes. This article will reflect on human viral replication and transmission, variable clinical presentation, assessment, treatment and discussion of complications. Isolation precautions according to infection prevention and control including protective apparel will be discussed with emphasis on criteria for discontinuation of transmission precaution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207