MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084594078 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c03613

Hydrothermal Monodisperse Microspherulite Pyrite: Novel Synthesis Process and Electrochemical Study of Its Oxidation

2020· article· en· W3084594078 on OpenAlexafffund
Lin Li, Ahmad Ghahreman

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaBarrick Gold Corporation
KeywordsPyriteHydrothermal circulationElectrochemistryMarcasiteHydrothermal synthesisScanning electron microscopeChemical engineeringTransmission electron microscopyMaterials scienceChemistryCyclic voltammetryInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyMineralogyElectrodePhysical chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple one-step hydrothermal method was developed to synthesize pyrite (FeS2) sheet- and bulklike pyrite mineral. The Fe/S molar ratio determines the phase of FeS2, including pyrite and marcasite. The reaction temperature and time are key factors to regulate the structure, morphology, and size of pyrite. Scanning electron and transmission electron microscopy showed the formation of monodisperse microspherulite within 1 h reaction time, and the particles aggregated to large irregular polyhedron particles with increasing reaction time up to 4 h. Electrochemical oxidation tests demonstrated that their electrochemical activity significantly decreased with increasing synthesis time. At an elevated temperature of 200 °C, bulk pyrite was obtained after a 24 h reaction time, which could have promising applications in hydrothermal pyrite ore oxidation research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207