MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084658950 · doi:10.1109/tns.2020.3023687

Effects of High-Dose X-Ray Irradiation on the Hole Lifetime in Vacuum-Deposited Stabilized a-Se Photoconductive Films: Implications to the Quality Control of a-Se Used in X-Ray Detectors

2020· article· en· W3084658950 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Simonson, Robert E. Johanson, Safa Kasap

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsIrradiationX-ray detectorElectric fieldElectron mobilityDetectorPhotoconductivityPhysicsX-rayPhotonSemiconductor detectorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stabilized amorphous selenium (a-Se)-based digital flat-panel X-ray imaging detectors are widely used in modern mammography. The dependence of the hole lifetime, τ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">h</sub> , in a-Se on high-dose X-ray irradiation under high electric fields is examined. The X-ray-induced effects on the samples were studied using conventional time-of-flight (TOF) and interrupted-field time-of-flight (IFTOF) techniques. The samples were placed under a high electric field (5-10 V/μm) and exposed to X-ray irradiation, after which TOF and IFTOF measurements were taken to find the hole drift mobility and lifetime after X-ray exposure. There was no observed change in the hole drift mobility but there was a large drop in the hole lifetime. The reduction in the hole lifetime depended only on the total or accumulated dose and the applied field. There was no dependence on the dose rate, over a range of 0.12-2.5 Gy/s, or on the X-ray photon energy, over a range of 50-90 keVp (corresponding to a mean photon energy of 31.9-44.7 keV). The implications of these findings can be seen through the calculation of the charge collection efficiency (CCE). The results show that the effects of X-ray irradiation on a-Se X-ray detectors are considerable when the detector is under an applied field during exposure, but are minimized when the operating field is high (corresponding to a high CCE) and the a-Se is of high-quality electronic grade material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207