MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084756302 · doi:10.4000/books.pur.44376

Introduction : mettre en dialogue économie sociale et solidaire, territoires et innovations

2015· book-chapter· fr· W3084756302 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emmanuel Bioteau, Karine Féniès-Dupont, Valérie Billaudeau, Caroline Dewynter

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Rennes eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comment considérer les rapports et les apports aux dynamiques des territoires des entreprises d’ESS ? Tout comme le stipule le texte de la loi cadre du 31 juillet 2014, nous incluons comme faisant partie de l’ESS les entreprises dont les activités sont d’utilité sociale sous le statut ESUS tout comme les structures historiques que sont les associations, les coopératives, les mutuelles et les fondations. Hormis des études menées au Canada (Fontan, Klein et Lévesque, 2003 ; Comeau, 2009 ; Fleu...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Rennes eBooksSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207