MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084815133 · doi:10.4000/laboreal.16231

29 de noviembre del 2017 : ¿prohibición definitiva del amianto en Brasil ?Un (largo) proceso todavía no concluido

2020· article· es· W3084815133 on OpenAlexaff
Augusto Rogério Leitão, Lays Helena Paes e Silva Dolivet

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboreal · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

¿prohibición definitiva del amianto en Brasil ?Un (largo) proceso todavía no concluido 29 de novembro de 2017 : interdição definitiva do amianto no Brasil ?Um (longo) processo ainda não encerrado 29 novembre 2017 : interdiction définitive de l'amiante au Brésil ?Un (long) processus inachevé 29 November 2017 : final interdiction on the use of asbestos in Brazil ?A (long) process still open

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaborealSame topicHealthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207