MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3084969798 · doi:10.14288/cjur.v5i1.188915

‘Post Truth’ Politics: The New Threat to Democracy

2016· article· en· W3084969798 on OpenAlexaff
Allison Fettes

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMisinformation and Its Impacts
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsDemocracyGlobePolitical scienceState (computer science)VotingPolitical economyPopulismMedia studiesLawSociologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, the United States elected Donald Trump, a reality TV business mogul, over Hillary Clinton, the former United States Secretary of State, as their 45thPresident. The impact of this election has been felt across the globe due to the bizarre campaigning of both Clinton and Trump including accusations of illegal activity, and frequent outright lies communicated to the public through candidate speeches, social media, and news agencies. It seems that the rise of populist voting activity and, what has been dubbed ‘post-truth’ politics played a significant role in Trump’s win. By looking at the semiotic aspect of political communication, political marketing, and the idea of ‘illusory democracy’, I argue that ‘post-truth’ politics are a threat to western democracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicMisinformation and Its ImpactsFrench-language works237,207