CHROMIUM (III) COMPLEX OF 2-AMINO-3-CARBOMETHOXY-4,5,6,7-TETRAHYDROBENZO[B] THIOPHENE: SYNTHESIS, CHARACTERIZATION AND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new chromium (III) coordination compound of 2-amino-3-carbomethoxy-4, 5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene (ACTT) (3) with Cr(NO3)3.9H2O in methanol at room temperature for 48 hours has been prepared. The composition of the new complex compound (4) has been confirmed by a number of instrumental methods including IR, NMR, MS and elemental analysis. It was found that the ACTT ligand behaves as bidentate chelating agent and coordinates to the central metal ion through the nitrogen atom of the amino-group and the oxygen atom of the carbonyl function of the ester group. The results showed that in the coordination sphere of the complex, the metal ion is coordinated by three chelating ACTT ligands. In the structure of the cation core [Cr(ACTT)3] 3+ , the three ACTT ligands are linked to the chromium ion through three Cr-N and three Cr-O bonds forming a square bipyramidal geometry. The metal complex and the ACTT ligand were screened for their antimicrobial activities against several strains of bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923, Escherichia coli S2 (1), Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, Shigella flexneri SDINT) and fungi (Candida albicans ATCC10231, Candida tropicalis PK233, Cryptococcus neoformans H99). The chromium complex showed promising antimicrobial activity against the microorganisms with minimum inhibitory values between 4 and 16 g/mL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".