Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo discuto elementos de la práctica matemática en la Guatemala colonial del siglo XVIII. La discusión de dicha práctica gira en particular alrededor del libro de matemáticas más antiguo que existe publicado en el período colonial en América Central: la Arithmetica practica del padre Juan José de Padilla, publicado en 1732. En la primera parte del artículo, describo brevemente mi encuentro con el libro de Padilla y los problemas contextuales que encontré para ofrecer una edición facsímil del mismo. En la segunda parte, defino la aproximación historiográfica que utilizo. Argumento que investigar acerca de las prácticas matemáticas históricas es indagar acerca de las matemáticas tal como fueron imaginadas, pensadas y utilizadas dentro de un cierto contexto histórico cultural. También es indagar sobre las maneras en que las matemáticas, los matemáticos, los libros de matemáticas y otros artefactos encajan y responden ideológicamente a las estructuras económicas, políticas y educativas de su tiempo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".