MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3085043607 · doi:10.22267/relatem.19123.81

La práctica matemática en la Guatemala colonial del siglo XVIII

2021· article· es· W3085043607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática Perspectivas Socioculturales de la Educación Matemática · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies in Science
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo discuto elementos de la práctica matemática en la Guatemala colonial del siglo XVIII. La discusión de dicha práctica gira en particular alrededor del libro de matemáticas más antiguo que existe publicado en el período colonial en América Central: la Arithmetica practica del padre Juan José de Padilla, publicado en 1732. En la primera parte del artículo, describo brevemente mi encuentro con el libro de Padilla y los problemas contextuales que encontré para ofrecer una edición facsímil del mismo. En la segunda parte, defino la aproximación historiográfica que utilizo. Argumento que investigar acerca de las prácticas matemáticas históricas es indagar acerca de las matemáticas tal como fueron imaginadas, pensadas y utilizadas dentro de un cierto contexto histórico cultural. También es indagar sobre las maneras en que las matemáticas, los matemáticos, los libros de matemáticas y otros artefactos encajan y responden ideológicamente a las estructuras económicas, políticas y educativas de su tiempo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it