Elevated Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor Levels in Patients With Active Phase of Adult-onset Still Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective Neutrophilia is a hallmark of adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). We aimed to investigate the levels of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), an essential regulator of neutrophil production and function, in the pathogenesis of AOSD. Methods Sera were collected from 70 patients with AOSD and 20 healthy controls (HCs). The levels of G-CSF were determined by ELISA. Low-density granulocytes (LDGs) were quantified by flow cytometry. Correlations between G-CSF levels and disease activity, laboratory variables, and LDG levels in patients with AOSD were analyzed by Spearman correlation test. Results Patients with active AOSD presented significantly higher levels of G-CSF compared to inactive AOSD patients ( P < 0.001) and HCs ( P < 0.0001). The G-CSF levels were significantly decreased after active AOSD patients achieved disease remission ( P = 0.0015). The G-CSF levels were significantly correlated with C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ferritin, and systemic score in AOSD ( P < 0.0001). Significant correlations between the levels of G-CSF and circulating neutrophils ( P < 0.0001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ( P < 0.0001), percentages of LDGs in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( P = 0.004), as well as absolute numbers of circulating LDGs ( P = 0.018) were identified. Patients with fever, evanescent rash, sore throat, arthralgia, myalgia, lymphadenopathy, or hepatomegaly/elevated liver enzymes displayed significantly higher levels of G-CSF compared to patients without these manifestations ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Our findings indicate that G-CSF is implicated in the pathogenesis of AOSD, and targeting G-CSF may have therapeutic potential for AOSD. In addition, introducing circulating G-CSF levels into the clinical assessment system may help to monitor disease activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".