MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3085104875 · doi:10.3917/riges.453.0016

Six mois plus tard…

2020· article· fr· W3085104875 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Caroline Boily

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsWorld Federation of Science Journalists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

APRÈS AVOIR AFFRONTÉ LA PREMIÈRE VAGUE D’UNE PANDÉMIE AUX RÉPERCUSSIONS SANS PRÉCÉDENT, LE MONDE DES AFFAIRES TIRE DES LEÇONS DES DERNIERS MOIS. ALORS QUE NOUS NOUS APPRÊTONS À TRAVERSER UN AUTOMNE QUI S’ANNONCE RICHE EN REBONDISSEMENTS, COMMENT POUVONS-NOUS NOUS PROJETER DANS L’AVENIR ? QUELLES PRATIQUES LA CRISE DE LA COVID-19 A-T-ELLE REMISES EN QUESTION OU PROPULSÉES À L’AVANT-PLAN ? HUIT PROFESSEURS DE HEC MONTRÉAL PROPOSENT DES RÉPONSES À CES QUESTIONS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestion→Same topicHealthcare Systems and Practices→French-language works237,207→