MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3085215334 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2754

A new understanding of L4 and L5 axial orbits through the torus structure

2020· article· en· W3085215334 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi Qi, Anton de Ruiter

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTorusPhysicsIsosurfaceInvariant (physics)Hamiltonian (control theory)Celestial mechanicsHamiltonian systemPeriodic orbitsAmplitudeClassical mechanicsGeometryMathematical physicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In this paper, through the critical isosurface of the pseudo-Hamiltonian of co-orbital motions in the torus space, we provide a new understanding of L4 and L5 axial orbits and their invariant manifolds in the circular restricted three-body problem. The contact points on the critical isosurface of the pseudo-Hamiltonian correspond to the locations of L4 and L5 axial orbits in the torus space, and provide a set of good initial guesses of L4 and L5 axial orbits for the multiple shooting method. Furthermore, we calculate and analyse orbital behaviours of L4 and L5 axial orbit families. Based on the topological structure of the critical isosurface of the pseudo-Hamiltonian, compound dynamical motions of invariant manifolds associated with L4 and L5 axial orbits are discussed. We present an approximate estimation for libration amplitudes of different co-orbital portions of invariant manifolds. Results obtained from numerical integration demonstrate the validity of our semi-analytical approach in the torus space..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207