Methods developed during the first National Center for Biotechnology Information Structural Variation Codeathon at Baylor College of Medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In October 2019, 46 scientists from around the world participated in the first National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Structural Variation (SV) Codeathon at Baylor College of Medicine. The charge of this first annual working session was to identify ongoing challenges around the topics of SV and graph genomes, and in response to design reliable methods to facilitate their study. Over three days, seven working groups each designed and developed new open-sourced methods to improve the bioinformatic analysis of genomic SVs represented in next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. The groups’ approaches addressed a wide range of problems in SV detection and analysis, including quality control (QC) assessments of metagenome assemblies and population-scale VCF files, de novo copy number variation (CNV) detection based on continuous long sequence reads, the representation of sequence variation using graph genomes, and the development of an SV annotation pipeline. A summary of the questions and developments that arose during the daily discussions between groups is outlined. The new methods are publicly available at https://github.com/NCBI-Codeathons/ , and demonstrate that a codeathon devoted to SV analysis can produce valuable new insights both for participants and for the broader research community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".