MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3085697962 · doi:10.4002/040.063.0110

Low Genetic Diversity in a Potential (Glacial) Relict: The Rocky Mountain Capshell, Acroloxus coloradensis (Henderson, 1930) (Gastropoda: Acroloxidae)

2020· article· en· W3085697962 on OpenAlexaffabout
Björn Stelbrink, Bonnie K. Ellis, Annie Paquet, Christian Albrecht

Bibliographic record

VenueMalacologia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGenetic diversityEcologyGlacial periodLimpetGenetic variationPopulationGastropodaPhylogeographyAllopatric speciationGenetic structureZoologyPhylogeneticsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acroloxus coloradensis is a rare and potentially glacial relict freshwater limpet species endemic to North America. However, despite its remarkable patchy distribution across the continent, only very few genetic data is available for the different populations. Here, we sequenced two standard barcoding markers for individuals from five populations to shed some light on the genetic population structure of this species. Overall, our genetic analyses revealed low genetic variation and identified three and two haplotypes for COI and 16S rRNA, respectively. The three Rocky Mountain populations differed only slightly for COI and shared the same haplotype for 16S rRNA. For both markers, no genetic variation was detected within the two populations sampled in Québec. The present genetic data suggest that A. coloradensis is indeed a relict species and that the distribution of this species was strongly affected by the last glacial retreat in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMalacologiaSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207