MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3085774902 · doi:10.7759/cureus.10451

Acute Kidney Injury in a Patient With Cryoglobulinemia Secondary to Hepatic Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: Case Report and Literature Review

2020· article· en· W3085774902 on OpenAlexaff
Artsiom Klimko, Georgiana Toma, Nona Bejinariu, Silviu-Mihai Secareanu, Iuliana Andreiana

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCryoglobulinemiaLymphomaNephrologyPathologyAcute kidney injuryInternal medicineFulminant hepatitisGastroenterologyFulminantOccultKidneyHepatitisHepatitis C virusImmunologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a patient with IgM-predominant type I cryoglobulinemia (CG), who presented to our nephrology department with acute kidney injury. He was previously diagnosed with sensorimotor neuropathy, which was in remission with maintenance dose of corticosteroids. Upon admission, there were ulcerated, necrotic cutaneous lesions localized to the inner aspect of the thighs bilaterally. Further workup revealed a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, causing type I CG. Screening tests for hepatitis viruses were negative at this time. Under treatment with diuretics and high-potency glucocorticoids, the patient had an acceptable recovery of renal function and was referred to oncology for treatment. Unfortunately, three months later the patient succumbed to fulminant hepatitis, presumably secondary to reactivation of an occult hepatitis B/D co-infection. We further conducted a literature review to better describe patient characteristics and renal involvement in type I CG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207