Système de gouvernance et stratégie de capital risque industriel des groupes français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous étudions l’incidence des mécanismes de gouvernance sur les décisions stratégiques prises par les dirigeants, en particulier celles liées au capital risque industriel (CRI). Ce thème peu débattu par la littérature traitant du marché français mérite d’être approfondi. Notre étude englobe toutes les opérations de CRI initiées par les entreprises du SBF 120 sur la période 2000-2018. Nos principaux résultats mettent en exergue le rôle joué par la structure de propriété, les ressources spécifiques ainsi que le profil de l’actionnariat dans la réalisation des opérations de CRI. Ainsi, ce travail contribue à l’enrichissement du débat sur l’utilité de ces véhicules de financement de l’innovation pour l’économie française.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".