Pengaruh Seleksi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Trans Retail Indonesia Carrefour Panakukang Makassar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pengaruh Seleksi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Trans Retail Indonesia Carrefour Panakukang Makassar.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh seleksi terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Trans Retail Indonesia Carrefour Panakukang Makassar.Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah data primer dan sekunder.Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif dan analisis statitistik dengan beberapa teknik analisa melalui pemanfaatan Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) versi 17.0 for Windows antara lain, uji regresi linier sederhana,koefisien korelasi,koefisien determinasi dan uji t, dimana y =26,531 + 0,389X, r = 0,487, r2 = 0,237 (23,7%), t hitung = 4,056 dan t tabel = 1,674. Dari hasil penelitian ini diperoleh nilai t hitung lebih besar dari nilai t tabel (3,983 > 1,674) pada taraf nyata 0,05 (5%). Dengan demikian H0 ditolak dan menerima Ha, artinya seleksi berpengaruh postif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Trans Retail indonesia Carrefour Panakukang Makassar.Dengan demikian hipotesis diterima.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it