MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>C</scp> anada, Families in

2016· other· en· W3086460200 on OpenAlex
Tim Dun, Ann Duffy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Family Studies · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrandparentEthnic groupDiversity (politics)Government (linguistics)Cultural diversityPolitical scienceGenealogySociologyGeographyLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Separated from the United States by the world's longest nonmilitarized border, Canada's 35.5 million people are heavily impacted by their much more populous neighbor. Although Canadian society and families are influenced by the dominant beliefs, values, and attitudes that characterize the United States, Canada is distinctive in both its history and some of its current social arrangements. For example, divorce rates, frequency of teen mothers, and the availability of government‐funded maternity leave differ. Canada, once typically approached by social researchers in terms of its anglophone and francophone divide, is becoming much more diverse. The shifting ethnic and cultural landscape and global economics contextualize the evolving Canadian family. Family size is decreasing, while the diversity in family forms grows. Marriage is delayed or avoided, with common‐law unions becoming a viable alternative to marriage. Other trends include more children living with common‐law parents, grandparents, and lone parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it