MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3086513911

FALANGISTS AND FRANCOISTS IN AMERICA (1936-1975): A STATE OF THE ART

2019· article· en· W3086513911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luis Velasco Martínez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish History and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanish Civil WarPoliticsNazismNeutralityWorld War IIState (computer science)Political scienceEmigrationConsolidation (business)Economic historyContext (archaeology)Political economySociologyLawHistoryEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939 on the political, social and economic life of America was very important. The high number of Spanish emigrants in the continent, as well as the economic, social, academic and political bonds were strong. The repercussions were specially obvious in the Spanish-speaking countries, although they were also present in the USA, Brazil and Canada. From the first moment all the American political actors rushed to take some kind of attitude towards the Spanish conflict. These positions were very varied; from those clearly marked towards the support of one of the contending parties to those of apparent or calculated neutrality. Likewise, the end of the Spanish Civil War and the consolidation of the Franco regime, in the first hand in the context of the Second World War and later in the Cold War scene, determined relations between Spain and the American nations. In this work we review some of the most recent contributions in this regard and offer some interpretative keys that help to introduce the status of the issue.Keywords: Falange, Francoism, America, Hispanity, Nazism, Fascism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpanish History and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207