MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3086527119 · doi:10.1701/3421.34062

VLCD E VLCKD nel trattamento di obesi affetti da diabete non insulinodipendente o prediabete: evidenze e riflessioni cliniche

2020· article· en· W3086527119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecenti Progressi in Medicina · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Obesity Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrediabetesMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusObesityCalorieWeight lossInsulinInternal medicineEndocrinologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes has become a major global public health issue. "Prediabetes" is the term used for individuals whose glucose levels do not meet the criteria for diabetes but are too high to be considered normal. Prediabetes is associated with obesity, especially visceral obesity, is a high risk state for diabetes. Obesity management can delay the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes and is beneficial in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In the strategy of weight loss there are several dietary approaches available, divided between low calories diet and very low-calorie diets (VLCDs). VLCDs include the very-low-carbohydrate diet (VLCKD) can lead to a state of ketosis. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has long been identified as an incurable chronic disease; on the contrary, there is evidence that the reversibility of type 2 diabetes is achievable using very low calorie diets or carbohydrate restriction diets. This report provides an update on the scientific evidence relating to highly low-calorie diets and the opinion of the President of the Italian Obesity Network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it