Bibliographic record
Abstract
Salah satu tujuan dari penyusunan Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) Kabupaten Sintang 2006 –2016 adalah dalam rangka memberikan pedoman teknis pemanfaatan ruang bagi kegiatan sosial ekonomimasyarakat, pendanaan, aspek hukum dan peraturan. Guna mewujudkan tujuan pengembangan wilayahtersebut, maka Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Sintang mengeluarkan Pemerintah Daerah KabupatenSintang Nomor 9 Tahun 2011 Tentang Penataaan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Kabupaten Sintang.Dalamimplementasi kebijakan penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Kecamatan Sintang, di pengaruhi oleh empatfaktor yaitu faktor komunikasi, sumber daya, disposisi atau sikap Aparatur dan struktur birokrasi. Faktorkomunikasi, disposisi, struktur birokrasi dan Sumber daya manusia merupakan faktor pendukung dalamimplementasi kebijakan penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Kecamatan Sintang, sedangkan faktor sumberdaya peralatan dan anggaran merupakan faktor penghambat dalam dalam implementasi kebijakan penataanPedagang Kaki Lima di Kecamatan Sintang. Sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa implemntasi kebijakanpenataan Pedagang Kaki Lima di Kecamatan Sintang belum dapat dilaksanakan sebagaimana mestinyasesuai dengan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 9 Tahun 2011.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".