MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3086697009 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2014548117

Reply to Bada: Acidity and fluid composition on the Tagish Lake parent body

2020· letter· en· W3086697009 on OpenAlexaff
L. F. White, K. T. Tait, Brian Langelier, Elizabeth A. Lymer, Ana Černok, T. V. Kizovski, Chi Ma, Oliver Tschauner, Richard I. Nicklin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario MuseumYork UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimelineScope (computer science)Yield (engineering)Composition (language)Key (lock)RacemizationComputer scienceChemistryMathematicsPhysicsStatisticsThermodynamicsStereochemistryArtComputer securityLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comment from Bada (1) attempts to flag multiple issues with our recent study (2). We appreciate the opportunity to respond, as Bada raises some interesting points, but many of his comments appear to overinterpret our results in a manner well beyond the scope of our original study. We believe Bada’s comments (1) can be broadly grouped into two key points for discussion: 1) the calculation used to yield the racemization timeline and 2) issues with our final conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicOrigins and Evolution of LifeFrench-language works237,207