MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3086734622

DEVELOPING CHENOPODIUM FICIFOLIUM AS A DIPLOID MODEL SYSTEM RELEVANT TO GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF ALLOTETRAPLOID C. QUINOA

2020· article· en· W3086734622 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Madhav Subedi

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChenopodium quinoaPloidyBiologyGeneticsGenetic diversityBotanyEvolutionary biologyGenePopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa Willd., is a potential new high-value crop for Northern New England (NNE) because of its excellent nutritional qualities and its ability to grow in diverse agroecosystems. However, quinoa field trials have not been successful thus far in NNE because of some major issues such as downy mildew disease, severe lodging (bending over), excessive branching, overly long maturation time, and immature grains at harvest. Quinoa is an allotetraploid (2n=4x=36) species of genome composition AABB, and thus has two distinct diploid ancestors. This study reports foundational genetic studies in the BB diploid (2n=2x=18) ancestor, Chenopodium ficifolium, as a potential model system for genetic studies relevant to quinoa gene identification and marker-assisted breeding. The specific objectives of this research were to (1) To make crosses/hybrid between C. ficifolium accessions (2) To evaluate the parental accessions for differences in various traits relevant to quinoa breeding programs and to study the extent of segregation of those traits in F2 generation populations (3) To identify the marker-trait association between the FTL locus marker and any of the segregating traits. C. ficifolium accessions, Portsmouth (P) and Quebec City (QC) were collected from two locations and were reciprocally crossed to generate F1 hybrids, which upon molecular confirmation of hybridity were self-crossed to produce F2 generation populations. Phenotypic data were collected and F2 generation segregation was evident for several agronomically relevant traits, including flowering time, plant height, the number of branches, branch angle, internode distance, and leaf chlorophyll content. The FTL marker locus was used for genotyping the F1 and the F2 population, and both FTL homologs, FTL1 and FTL2, were characterized molecularly by sequencing the PCR amplicons generated from the CrFT345For and CrFT501Rev primer pair. Marker-trait associations were detected in the F2 population between the FTL1 marker and each of three important agronomic traits: flowering time, plant height, and the number of branches. A high positive correlation was also found among the traits flowering time, plant height, and the number of branches. Genomic sequences of P and QC accessions were compared to the quinoa reference genome and 5,218,465 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected in the P and QC accessions. Polymorphisms were also identified between P and QC accessions for the coding sequence and promoter region of the FTL1 gene that could have some functional significance with the observed trait variance in the F2 population. Although the association of the FTL1 gene to the various traits was identified, this study was not able to confirm a functional role of the FTL1 gene with any of the agronomic traits evaluated. An appropriate growing environment for C. ficifolium was also identified that provided for proper growth and ease of visualization of phenotypic differences between the studied accessions of C. ficifolium. Overall, these results validate and contribute to the development of C. ficifolium as an appropriate diploid model system for studying the genetic and molecular basis for agronomic trait diversity in the related tetraploid crop plant, quinoa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)Same topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207