Gene co-expression and alternative splicing analysis of key metabolic tissues to unravel the regulatory signatures of fatty acid composition in cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing the healthy/unhealthy fatty acid (FA) ratio in meat is one of the urgent tasks required to address consumer concerns. However, the regulatory mechanisms ultimately resulting in FA profiles vary among animals and remain largely unknown. In this study, using ~1.2 Tb high-quality RNA-Seq-based transcriptomic data of 188 samples from four key metabolic tissues (rumen, liver, muscle, and backfat) together with the contents of 49 FAs in backfat, the molecular regulatory mechanisms of these tissues contributing to FA formation in cattle were explored. Using this large dataset, the alternative splicing (AS) events, one of the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in four tissues were identified. The highly conserved and absent AS events were detected in rumen tissue, which may contribute to its functional differences compared with the other three tissues. In addition, the healthy/unhealthy FA ratio related AS events, differential expressed (DE) genes, co-expressed genes, and their functions in four tissues were analysed. Eight key genes were identified from the integrated analysis of DE, co-expressed, and AS genes between animals with high and low healthy/unhealthy FA ratios. This study provides an applicable pipeline for AS events based on comprehensive RNA-Seq analysis and improves our understanding of the regulatory mechanism of FAs in beef cattle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".